In today's FirstScroll, we break down how a company laying India's internet cables can grow fast, book rising profits, and still be so short of cash it has to ask the public for money.
With that out of the way, let's dive into today's story.
The Story
Here is a company that, on the face of it, is doing everything right.
Annu Projects builds infrastructure most of us never see: the sewer lines under our roads, the gas pipelines feeding our kitchens, and increasingly, the fibre-optic cables that carry India's internet. It recently won a ₹918 crore work order tied to BharatNet, the government's push to wire up rural India. Its revenue is climbing, and between FY25 and FY26 its profit jumped 56%. Growing order book, growing profit. This is what a healthy business is supposed to look like.
And yet, this same company just went to the public market to raise ₹175 crore, and a big reason is that it needs cash to keep the lights of its own operations on.
So the question is, how does a profitable, fast-growing company end up so short of money that it has to sell a chunk of itself to strangers?
The answer lives in one of the most important gaps in all of finance, the gap between profit and cash. They sound like the same thing. They are not, and confusing them is how people misread companies.
Here is the trick. In accounting, a company books a sale the moment it finishes the work and raises an invoice, not when the money actually arrives. So the day Annu completes a stretch of pipeline and bills its customer, that amount counts as revenue and flows into profit, even if not a single rupee has landed in its bank account yet. On paper, the company looks richer. In its wallet, nothing has changed.
Most of the time this gap is small and harmless, because customers pay reasonably quickly. But look at who Annu's customers are: government departments, public sector bodies, large infrastructure firms. These are reliable payers, but famously slow ones. And the filing shows exactly how slow. The company's receivable days rose to 237 in FY26, up from 163 the year before.
Let's unpack that number, because it is the whole story. "Receivable days" is simply the average number of days a company waits to get paid after it has done the work. Annu now waits about 237 days, roughly eight months, to collect its money. Eight months during which it has already reported the profit, already paid its own workers and suppliers, and already bought the materials, all while the cash it is owed sits in someone else's account.
And here's the twist most people miss. Growth makes this worse, not better.
Think about it. Every new project means buying materials and paying labour upfront, today, in cash. The payment for that work arrives eight months later. So the faster Annu grows, the more projects it runs at once, and the bigger the pile of money it has spent but not yet collected. A company standing still can manage a long payment cycle. A company sprinting through it needs an ever-larger stack of cash just to bridge the gap between doing the work and getting paid. This is called working capital, and for a fast-growing contractor it is a treadmill that speeds up the more successful you become.
Which reframes the entire IPO. Annu is not raising money because it is failing. It is raising money because it is growing into a cash squeeze that its own profits, real as they are, cannot fund fast enough. The ₹175 crore is fuel to keep running on that treadmill.
Now, why should you care about the plumbing of one infrastructure company? Because this single distinction, profit versus cash, is one of the sharpest tools you have for reading any business. A company can report years of rising profits and still collapse, because profit is an accounting opinion while cash is a hard fact. Bills get paid in cash, not in profit. When you look at a company, especially one that sells to slow-paying customers, the question is not just "is it profitable?" but "is the profit turning into money, and how long is it taking?" The receivable-days number, buried in the notes, often answers that faster than the headline profit ever will.
None of this makes Annu a bad business. Slow-paying government clients are the price of doing infrastructure work, and a fat order book is a genuine asset. But it does change what you are being asked to buy. You are not buying a cash machine. You are buying a company that does real work, books real profit, and then waits the better part of a year to see the money, funding the wait by, among other things, this very share sale.
So the paradox resolves cleanly. Annu Projects is short of cash not despite its growth but because of it, and not despite its profit but alongside it. The profit is real. It is just parked, for eight months at a time, in the accounts of the government departments it serves.
Whether the market rewards a business built on patient, slow-paying money is something its journey as a listed company will now reveal.
Until then…
If this helped you separate profit from cash, share it with a friend on WhatsApp, LinkedIn or X.
